What a C3PAO Actually Submits to the CMMC Accreditation Body

Post Preview

There’s a lot of mystery behind what a Certified Third-Party Assessor Organization (C3PAO) really does after evaluating a company’s cybersecurity. For businesses working toward CMMC compliance requirements, it’s more than just passing a test—it’s about proving every step taken to secure sensitive data. The submission process to the CMMC Accreditation Body (CMMC-AB) is where all the real evidence lands.

Table of Contents

Comprehensive Security Control Validation Reports

Every CMMC assessment starts with a deep review of how well security controls are working in real time. This is more than just confirming that the right tools are in place—it’s about showing those tools are doing their job consistently and securely. A C3PAO compiles a report that details each requirement under the CMMC level 1 requirements or CMMC level 2 requirements, depending on the scope of the engagement. These reports go into technical depth, confirming whether systems meet expected performance standards and are protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) as required.

These reports are not written to impress—they’re written to prove. The C3PAO has to show the CMMC-AB that the assessment wasn’t just a checklist exercise. Instead, every control is tested, observed, and measured for effectiveness. The result is a comprehensive document that reflects the real security posture of an organization. CMMC compliance requirements demand this kind of evidence-backed confirmation.

Objective Evidence Cataloging Cybersecurity Compliance

Objective evidence is what separates a claim from a fact. For a company to meet CMMC level 2 requirements, simply saying “we encrypt data” isn’t enough. A C3PAO must gather actual screenshots, logs, configurations, or procedures to back it up. This catalog of evidence is one of the main pieces submitted to the CMMC-AB, showing exactly how the company satisfies each practice and process.

Each file, screenshot, or system record submitted serves a purpose. It’s collected during the assessment and directly supports the findings in the validation report. This objective evidence ties into the greater puzzle of CMMC assessment verification. Without it, nothing submitted holds up, especially in the eyes of the CMMC-AB, which leans heavily on visible proof, not verbal confirmation.

System Security Plan SSP Verification Documentation

Before any assessment begins, the company provides a System Security Plan (SSP)—a map of its entire security setup. This document explains how the company meets each security requirement, but it’s up to the C3PAO to verify its accuracy. That’s where SSP verification documentation comes into play.

The C3PAO doesn’t just accept the SSP as-is. During the CMMC assessment, they dig into every section and compare it to real-world evidence and interviews. Their job is to confirm the SSP aligns with how systems are actually configured and managed. Once verified, the findings are submitted to the CMMC-AB to demonstrate the SSP’s reliability as a baseline for cybersecurity practices.

Official Attestation of Assessment Outcomes

After all tests and reviews are completed, the C3PAO delivers a signed attestation that states the organization’s outcome. This document is official—it clearly states whether the company has passed or failed the CMMC assessment, and it’s submitted directly to the CMMC-AB. It’s not just a score; it’s a professional endorsement of compliance or lack thereof.

This attestation includes context behind the result. For example, if a company met 100% of the CMMC level 1 requirements but fell short on a few level 2 practices, that nuance is explained. This summary of performance helps the CMMC-AB evaluate both the results and the quality of the assessment process itself.

Remediation Status and Findings Summary

Even strong cybersecurity programs can have gaps. The C3PAO prepares a detailed summary showing where the company succeeded and where improvements are needed. This summary breaks down every finding from the assessment and marks whether it was addressed immediately or left pending in a remediation plan.

The remediation status helps paint a fuller picture for the CMMC-AB. A business might not pass every requirement on day one, but if progress has already begun, that momentum matters. The C3PAO notes which issues are fixable and which may need reassessment later, adding context to the evaluation.

POA&M Documentation Detailing Security Deficiencies

If any gaps remain unresolved, the company creates a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M). It outlines what they’ll do, by when, and how. The C3PAO submits this as part of their report if deficiencies prevent full compliance with CMMC level 2 requirements. These documents prove that the company is aware of its weak points and committed to fixing them.

A POA&M is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. It’s a contract of sorts, showing the steps the company promises to take. The C3PAO reviews these documents carefully before including them in the submission. For CMMC compliance requirements, ongoing effort is often just as important as initial results.

Assessment Scope and Methodology Disclosure

Finally, the C3PAO explains exactly how the assessment was performed. That means stating which systems were in scope, which methods were used (interviews, technical testing, documentation review), and how findings were validated. This section ensures the CMMC-AB can understand the process from start to finish.

Without a clear methodology, even accurate results might not be trusted. The C3PAO ensures transparency by describing how each conclusion was reached. This helps confirm that the assessment meets the rigorous standards expected under the CMMC framework, whether addressing CMMC level 1 requirements or preparing companies for the deeper dive of level 2.